Six inviolable rules to claiming horses

This post was written by admin on September 22, 2008
Posted Under: Amusing, Claiming races

Occasionally — as in, very rarely — someone will ask me how we go about identifying the horses we claim.  Usually, this question is asked in a semi-breathless manner, as if I just might be about to give them the key to life, the universe, and everything.

As it happens, that’s about right.  In fact, being able to claim horses successfully qualifies you to do all sorts of fun, exotic, and important jobs — I’m thinking “Vice President of the United States” looks pretty good on an otherwise undistinguished resume — so knowing how to do it is extraordinarily useful.

Heretofore, this valuable skill has been the purview of a small, secretive, Mason-like group of trainer-monks who hoarded the information as if it were gold.  Which, in a way, it is.

Now, however, as a public service, I’m going to throw open the doors to the mint, shine a bright light on the dark corners of this mysterious world, and engage in the overuse of numerous other cliches, which I shall employ willy-nilly.

Still, there are several hard and fast rules to claiming horses.  Which we usually follow.  Except when we don’t.   To wit:

WHEN CLAIMING HORSES…

  • DO NOT claim horses whose names involve several words all jammed into one long word (e.g., Aflareandaprayer, running at Belmont this week, or Don’tmesswithrandy, at Laurel).  These are just bad names, and why on earth would you want to buy a horse with a bad name?  Their badness is exacerbated when one or more of the words is misspelled.
  • DO claim gray horses.  Everyone loves grays, and even if the one you claim couldn’t win a donkey race (though might still beat The Green Monkey), you’ll at least have the pleasure of hearing someone at the paddock say, “That’s a pretty gray horse.”
  • DO NOT claim horses whose names are too optimistic.  We once claimed a horse named “First by Five,” but after several months, it was pretty clear that “Fourth by Four-and-a-half” would have been more apropos.  Bad enough to lose races; you don’t also want to hear the taunting voice of the track announcer noting that your horse, “Always First,” instead shall be last.
  • DO claim horses with two-word names when both words are adjectives or common nouns (e.g., Fine Shine, Art Major, Kings Challenge).  Why?  I dunno.  They just seem to work out.
  • DO NOT claim horses whose names are too pessimistic.  It’s just bad karma.  There used to be a horse in Maryland named Low Byars; a horse with a name like that who runs poorly is like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
  • DO claim horses who try hard, even if they have no talent.  It’s much less exasperating when your horse tries hard and loses than when your more talented animal loafs around the track.

Of course, that’s not everything there is to know about claiming horses.  I can’t tell you everything.  For one thing, I don’t know everything.  For another, the super-secret society of trainer-monks might come after me if I divulged all the secrets.

Still, if you follow these inviolable rules, you should end up with pretty, hard-trying, possibly slow horses with good names.  And I’d say that’s at least half the battle.

Reader Comments

“Fourth by Four-and-a-half” - that’s funny! Great post.

#1 
Written By Alan H. on September 22nd, 2008 @ 8:45 pm

I always feel bad for horses with pathetic names, such as Claim Me Please (Hennessy-Icanseeyounow, by Deputy Minister) who’s now based at Philly Park. Never viewed as allowance, let alone stakes, quality, eh? Poor guy.

But his dam’s siblings kinda break the “several words jammed into one long word” rule; Ifyoucouldseemenow, Doyouseewhatisee, and Nowi’veseenitall were all graded stakes-placed.

Fun post!

#2 
Written By Valerie on September 22nd, 2008 @ 11:24 pm

I make it a point almost never to bet those “see what I can squeeze from seventeen characters” names–they are a scourge on the face of creative thinking!

There’s a horse that races in NY called Youbethecan–which I have always said in my head “You bet the can” (despite the missing “t”); Steve Crist has, I think, written that he reads it as “You be the can”; it is, it seems to be, “You bet he can.”

Absurd!

#3 
Written By Teresa on September 23rd, 2008 @ 2:22 pm

Hmmm…I think I’d be looking at the horses with lousy names as potential bargains.

#4 
Written By Alex on September 23rd, 2008 @ 10:20 pm

Rule # 7 (especially in New York): Don’t claim horses whose owners have decided to advertise by putting their name on every horse they own. E.g., Karakorum Whatever, Watral’s Slowpoke, Winloc’s Loser. Even if they can run for you, everyone will still think the original owner has the horse.

#5 
Written By Steve Zorn on September 23rd, 2008 @ 11:00 pm

Thanks for checking in, Alan… good to have a bug boy aboard!

Steve — good point. A corollary to that rule, I think, would be don’t name all your horses Karakorum Whatever, etc., b/c it guarantees that everyone will notice (and remember) the ones that stink.

Teresa — I know that horse. Even though it’s obviously You bet he can, every time I look at the name I think, You be the can. It’s actually better that way!

Leave it to Val to refute my cockamamie theory with actual facts!

Alex… possible study there, eh?

#6 
Written By admin on September 24th, 2008 @ 10:36 am

Frank - Your last comment just inspired my next blog post…and possibly a research project.

#7 
Written By Alex on September 25th, 2008 @ 10:37 am

That last comment is the biggest for me when choosing a horse. If a horse has a good work ethic and will try for you - you can overlook nearly everything else. As long as they are giving their best, its all you can ask.

#8 
Written By Jennifer in Florida on October 29th, 2008 @ 11:40 am

Never ever claim a horse from Peter Ferriola.

#9 
Written By Gasper Moshera on June 11th, 2009 @ 6:45 am

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address

Next Post: New feature
Previose Post: Alumni Report